Preparing students to be critical questioners of how writing works in any rhetorical situation dovetails with my interests in developing a project-based pedagogy and incorporating new media assignments that require students to go beyond the classroom to investigate and write within authentic rhetorical situations.
Much of my motivation as a teacher and researcher of writing has been a result of my successes and failures as a writer. I struggled as a writer in my first literature course while I excelled in creative writing. Why was I failing in one writing situation but succeeding in another? The disparity between these experiences is how my interest in writing studies began.
The simple answer was that I wasn’t aware of the discursive conventions used to write about literature. The conventions of writing narratives, of course, differed from those in a literary analysis essay; however, I had spent my lifetime reading and writing narratives, but I hadn’t read literary criticism or been asked to analyze literature. High school had prepared me to summarize in book reports and memorize facts for multiple choice tests. Further, my creative writing courses included explicit instruction in generic conventions (something Wolff and Wilder’s research demonstrates to be successful in a redesigned introductory “Writing About Literature” course). What I needed was the knowledge of how to meet the demands of this particular genre and rhetorical situation. I needed to know how one thought-spoke-wrote about literature and participated within this discourse community.
During this experience I came to see my previous undergraduate work as a visual artist and filmmaker in a new light. Working with different technologies, media, and genres required learning about the technical skills, design choices, and discourse conventions within a specific community of practice. Visual, aural, and gestural modes might not matter in the linguistic-centric writing we typically ask students to do in English Studies, but other concepts can apply, e.g., purpose, audience, emphasis, contrast.
- 5170: Introduction to Composition Theory
- 4910/5970: Writing and Publishing in New Media
- 4870/5970: Fans, Gamers, Tweeters: Digital Rhetoric and Participatory Cultures
- 4860: Visual Rhetoric
- 3810: History and Origins of Writing
- 3830: Writing Beyond the Academy
- 2880: Professional Writing
- 2050: Intro to Rhetorical Analysis
- 1020: Rhetoric and Composition II
- 1010/1011: Rhetoric and Composition I
So when it came to my students’ success in a required course such as first-year composition, I explored ways in which I could construct opportunities for students to investigate writing within particular communities. My initial answers are found in my Master’s thesis study of academic service-learning (AS-L) in first-year composition. In these courses, my students chose to work with one of roughly a dozen non-profit community agencies and organizations. My intention was to juxtapose the academic writing they did in our course with that they did for the non-profits would help them see how writing was organized and valued within particular contexts; in class we could discuss differences in exigences, audiences, and genre and media. For example, what were the similarities and differences between writing a literacy narrative in school and the journal writing women did within a domestic violence support group? The hope is that this might lead to the acquisition of a transferrable meta-level knowledge of discourse.
This focus on preparing students to be critical questioners of how writing works in any rhetorical situation dovetails with my interests in developing a project-based pedagogy and incorporating new media assignments that require students to go beyond the classroom to investigate and write within authentic rhetorical situations.
For example, in my Fall 2015 Visual Rhetoric course, I designed assignments that asked students to apply both rhetorical and design knowledge to create multimodal texts for the City’s Chattanooga Forward initiative. In this scenario, students chose from broad topics such as housing, outdoor activities, the downtown, and technology based on our client’s needs. We were fortunate enough to work with Mayor Berke’s Senior Adviser, Stacy Richardson, and this partnership allowed us to have in-class conversations beyond rhetoric and design; we explored the ethics of ghostwriting and using statistics to compose data visualizations.
A few students interested in housing struggled to mitigate the socioeconomic tensions between satisfying the client’s desire to encourage residing downtown and increasing population density with their own desires for more affordable housing. How might they market downtown living in ways that might avoid reenforcing existing racial and economic inequities?
Students’ reactions have been positive. Many students have responded along the following lines regarding our multimodal projects: “I have a whole new perspective about writing.” “He still taught us about writing and had us write, but it was in a way that was actually fun and made me think deeper about my writing.” “[This was] a project that could easily be seen in any number of professional industry projects.”
My goals as a writing teacher, then, has been, and continues to be, for my students to learn how writing works—how it shapes and is being shaped by culture, how literate practices evolve over time and within and through communities and institutions.